Page 29 - CONCEPTIONSOFGIFTEDNESS

áÑgƒªdG º«gÉØe 28

™LGôªdG

Benbow, C. P. (1986). SMPY’s model for teaching mathematically preco-
cious students. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for develop-
ing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 1–26). Mansfield Center,
CT: Creative Learning Press.

Berlin, I. (1990). The crooked timber of humanity: Chapters in the history
of ideas (H. Hardy, Ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Borland, J. H. (1989). Planning and implementing programs for the gifted.
New York: Teachers College Press.

Borland, J. H. (1996a). Gifted education and the threat of irrelevance.
Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 129–147.

Borland, J. H. (1996b). [Review of Playing Favorites by Mara Sapon-
Shevin]. Roeper Review, 18, 309–311.

Borland, J. H. (2003). The death of giftedness. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Re-
thinking gifted education (pp. 105–124). New York: Teachers College
Press.

Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (1994). Identifying young, potentially gifted,
economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 164–
171.

Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (2001). Identifying and educating poor and
underrepresented gifted students. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. J.
Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.). International handbook of research
and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 587–594). London: Per-
gamon Press.

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experi-
mental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Chandler, D. (2001). Semiotics for beginners. Retrieved from http://www.
aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/sem02a.html.

Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (2001). Being gifted in school: An introduc-
tion to development, guidance, and teaching. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Delcourt, M. A. B., Loyd, B. H., Cornell, D. G.,&Goldberg, M. D. (1994).
Evaluation of the effects of programming arrangements on student
learning outcomes. Charlottesville, VA: The National Research Center
on the Gifted and Talented.