Page 30 - CONCEPTIONSOFGIFTEDNESS

29 ø«Hƒgƒe ∫ÉØWCG ¿hO ø«HƒgƒªdG á«HôJ

Ford, D. Y. (1996). Reversing underachievement among gifted Black stu-
dents. New York: Teachers College Press.

Ford, D. Y., & Harris, J. J. (1999). Multicultural gifted education. New
York: Teachers College Press.

Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A.
Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage. (Original work published 1975.)

Franklin, B. M. (1987). The first crusade for learning disabilities. In T.
Popkewitz (Ed.), The formation of school subjects: The struggle for cre-
ating an American institution (pp. 190–209). London: Falmer.

Gallagher, J. J. (1996). A critique of critiques of gifted education. Journal
for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 234–249.

Gallagher, S. (1999). An exchange of gazes. In J. L. Kinchloe, S. R. Stein-
berg, & L. E. Villeverde (Eds.), Rethinking intelligence (pp. 69–84). New
York: Routledge.

Goddard, H. H. (1919). Psychology of the normal and the subnormal.
New York: Dodd Mead.

Gray, J. (1996). Isaiah Berlin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Hall, S. (Ed.). (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signi-
fying practices:Vol. 2. Culture, media and identities. Beverly Hills, CA:
Sage.

Henry, T. S. (1920). Classroom problems in the education of gifted chil-
dren. The nineteenth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of
Education (Part II). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hollingworth, L. S. (1929). Gifted children: Their nature and nurture. New
York: Macmillan.

Horowitz, F. D., & O’Brien, M. (Eds.) (1986). The gifted and talented:
Developmental perspectives (pp. 99–123).Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association.

Kliebard, H. M. (1995). The struggle for the American curriculum. New
York: Routledge.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962/1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.

Margolin, L. (1994). Goodness personified: The emergence of gifted chil-
dren. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.