Page 527 - TEACHINGMODELSINEDUCATIONOFTHE GIFTED

‫ مراجع‬ 514

prizes: Talent development and problem solving with at-risk popu­
lations (pp. 63–76). Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.

Puccio, G. J., & Gonzalez, D. W. (2004). The nature and nurture of
creative thinking: Western approaches and emerging thoughts about
issues in the East. In S. Lau, A. Hui, & G. Y. C. Ng (Eds.), Creativity:
When east meets west. (pp. 393–428). Singapore: World Scientific.

Rash, P. K., & Miller, A. D. (2000). A survey of practices of teachers
of the gifted. Roeper Review, 22, 94–94. (Abstract ERIC Document
Reproduction Service No. EJ606615)

Raths, L. E. (1963). Clarifying values. In R. S. Fleming (Ed.),
Curriculum for today’s boys and girls (pp. 315–342). Columbus, OH:
Merrill.

Raths, L. E., Harmin, M., & Simon, S. B. (1966). Values and teaching.
Columbus, OH: M­ errill.

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.

Reilly, R. R., & Chao, G. R. (1982). Validity and fairness of some
alternative employee selection procedures. Personnel Psychology,
35, 1–62.

Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (1982). A research report on the
Revolving Door Identification Model: A case for the broadened
conception of giftedness. Phi Delta Kappan, 63, 619–620.

Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2003). Research related to the
schoolwide enrichment model. Gifted Education International, 18,
15–39.

Reis, S. M., & Schack, G. D. (1993). Differentiating products for the
gifted and talented: The encouragement of independent learning. In
C. J. Maker & D. Orzechowski-Harland (Eds.), Critical issues in gifted
education: Vol. III. Programs for the gifted in regular classrooms (pp.
161–186). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.