Page 523 - TEACHINGMODELSINEDUCATIONOFTHE GIFTED
P. 523
مراجع 510
Maltby, F., & Cowan, E. (1995). The use of TASC to develop
a selection of tools for effective thinking. Gifted Education
International, 11, 18–23.
Mansfield, R. S., Busse, F. V., & Krepelka, E. J. (1978). The
effectiveness of creativity training. Review of Educational Research,
48, 517–536.
Martensen, D., Eriksson, H., & Ingleman-Sundberg, M. (1985).
Medical chemistry: Evaluation of active and problem-oriented
teaching methods. Medical Education, 19, 34–42.
Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper
& Row.
Mayor, J. (1966). The University of Maryland mathematics project
(Progress Report No. 11). College Park: University of Maryland,
College of Education.
McCluskey, K. W., Baker, P. A., O’Hagan, S. C., & Treffinger, D. J.
(1995). Lost prizes: Talent development and problem solving among
at-risk students. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.
McGuire, C. (1963). Research in the process approach to the
construction and analysis of medical examinations. National Council
on Measurement in Education Yearbook, 20, 7–16.
Meador, K. S. (1994). The effect of synectics training on gifted and
nongifted kindergarten students. Journal for the Education of the
Gifted, 18, 55–73.
Milholland, J. E. (1966, February). An empirical examination of
the categories of the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Paper
presented at the Annual American Educational Research Association
Convention, Chicago.
Mills, C. J., & Durden, W. G. (1993). Cooperative learning and
ability grouping: An issue of choice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 11–
16.
