Page 51 - CONCEPTIONSOFGIFTEDNESS

áÑgƒªdG º«gÉØe 50

Bloom, B. S. (Ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Hand-
book I. The cognitive domain. New York: McKay.

Brody, L. E. (2001). The talent search model for meeting the academic
needs of gifted and talented students. Gifted and Talented International,
16, 99–102.

Brody, L. E. (2004). Meeting the diverse needs of gifted students through
individualized educational plans. In D. Boothe & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), In
the eyes of the beholder: Critical issues for diversity in gifted education
(pp. 129–138). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Brody, L. E.,&Blackburn, C. C. (1996). Nurturing exceptional talent: SET
as a legacy of SMPY. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual
talent: Psychometric and social issues (pp. 246–265). Baltimore: Johns
Hopkins University Press.

Brody, L. E.&Mills, C. J. (1997). Gifted children with learning
disabilities:Areview of the issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30
(3), 282–296.

Brody, L. E., Muratori, M. C., & Stanley, J. C. (2004). Early college en-
trance: Academic, social, and emotional considerations. In N. Colan-
gelo, S. G. Assouline, & M. U. M. Gross (Eds.), The Templeton National
Report on Acceleration, Vol. II. Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation.

Cox, C. M. (1926). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 2. The early men-
tal traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University
Press.

Durden, W. G., & Tangherlini, A. E. (1993). Smart kids. Seattle: Hogrefe
& Huber.

Fox, L. H. (1974). A mathematics program for fostering precocious
achievement. In J. C. Stanley, D. P. Keating, & L. H. Fox (Eds.), Mathe-
matical talent: Discovery, description, and development (pp. 101–125).
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Friedenberg, E. Z. (1966). The dignity of youth and other atavisms (pp.
119–135). Boston: Beacon.

George,W. C., Cohn, S. J., & Stanley, J. C. (Eds.) (1979). Educating the
gifted: Acceleration and enrichment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univer-
sity Press.