Page 53 - CONCEPTIONSOFGIFTEDNESS

áÑgƒªdG º«gÉØe 52

Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., Shea, D. L., Eftekhari-Sanjani, H., & Halvor-
son, M. B. J. (2001). Men and women at promise for scientific excel-
lence: Similarity not dissimilarity. Psychological Science, 12, 309–317.

Lubinski, D.,Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Top
1 in 10,000: A 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Ap-
plied Psychology, 86, 718–729.

Lupkowski-Shoplik, A., Benbow, C. P., Assouline, S. G.,&Brody, L. E.
(2003). Talent searches: Meeting the needs of academically talented
youth. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted educa-
tion, 3rd edition (pp. 204–218). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

McGinn, P. V. (1976). Verbally gifted youth. In D. P. Keating (Ed.), In-
tellectual talent: Research and development (pp. 160–182). Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins University Press.

Muratori, M., Colangelo, N., & Assouline, S. (2003). Early-entrance stu-
dents: Impressions of their first semester of college. Gifted Child Quar-
terly, 47, 219– 238.

Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2004). Talent search: Purposes, rationale, and
role in gifted education. In D. Boothe & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), In the
eyes of the beholder: Critical issues for diversity in gifted education (pp.
251–262). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2004). Curriculum compacting: A research-
based differentiation strategy for culturally diverse talented students. In
D. Boothe & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), In the eyes of the beholder: Critical
issues for diversity in gifted education (pp. 87–100).Waco, TX: Prufrock
Press.

Robinson, H. B. (1983). A case for radical acceleration: Programs of the
Johns Hopkins University and the University of Washington. In C. P.
Benbow & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Academic promise: Aspects of its de-
velopment (pp. 139–159). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Robinson, N. M., & Robinson, H. B. (1982). The optimal match: Devising
the best compromise for the highly gifted student. In D. Feldman (Ed.),
New directions for child development: Developmental approaches to
giftedness and creativity (pp. 79–94). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Roe, A. (1951). A psychological study of eminent physical scientists. Ge-
netic Psychology Monographs, 43, 121–239.