Page 54 - CONCEPTIONSOFGIFTEDNESS
P. 54
53 »¶Ø∏dG hGC /h »°VÉjôdG êÉàæà°S’G »a ¿ƒ¨HÉædG ÜÉÑ°ûdG
Sethna, B. N., Wickstrom, C. D., Boothe, D., & Stanley, J. C. (2001).
The Advanced Academy of Georgia: Four years as a residential early-
college-entrance program. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13,
11–21.
Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assess-
ing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents:A20-year
longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 604–614.
Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New
York: Guilford.
Southern, W. T., Jones, E. D., & Stanley, J. C. (1993). Acceleration and
enrichment: The content and development of program options. In E.
A. Keller, F. K. MÖnks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook
of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 387–409).
Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
Stanley, J. C. (1974). Intellectual precocity. In J. C. Stanley, D. P. Keat-
ing, & L. H. Fox (Eds.), Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and
development (pp. 1–22). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stanley, J. C. (1976). Special fast-math classes taught by college profes-
sors to fourththrough twelfth-graders. In D. P. Keating (Ed.), Intellec-
tual talent: Research and development (pp. 132–159). Baltimore: Johns
Hopkins University Press.
Stanley, J. C. (1977). Rationale of the Study of Mathematically Preco-
cious Youth (SMPY) during its first five years of promoting educational
acceleration. In J. C.
Stanley,W. C. George, & C. H. Solano (Eds.), The gifted and the creative:
A fifty-year perspective (pp. 75–112). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univer-
sity Press.
Stanley, J. C. (1979). The study and facilitation of talent for mathematics.
In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and the talented: Their education and
development. The seventy-eighth yearbook of the National Society for
the Study of Education (pp. 169– 185). Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
Stanley, J. C. (1980). Manipulate important educational variables. Educa-
tional Psychologist, 15(3), 164–171.
