Page 510 - TEACHINGMODELSINEDUCATIONOFTHE GIFTED
P. 510

497    ‫مراجع‬

   Betres, J., Zajano, M., & Gumieniak, P. (1984). Cognitive styles,
teacher methods and concept attainment in the social studies. Theory
& Research in Social Education, 12(2), 1–18.

   Betts, G. (1985). The Autonomous Learner Model for the gifted
and talented. Greeley, CO: A­ utonomous Learning Publications and
Specialists.

   Betts, G., & Kercher, J. (1999). Autonomous Learner Model:
Optimizing ability. Greeley, CO: Autonomous Learner Publications
and Specialists.

   Betts, G., & Knapp, J. (1981). Autonomous learning and the gifted:
A secondary model. In A. Arnold (Ed.), Secondary programs for the
gifted (pp. 29–36). Ventura, CA: Ventura Superintendent of Schools
Office.

   Beyer, B. K. (1984). Improving thinking skills: Practical approaches.
Phi Delta Kappan, 65, 556–560.

   Beyer, B. K. (1987). Practical strategies for the teaching of thinking.
Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

   Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The
classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain.
New York: Longmans, Green.

   Blumberg, P., & Michael, J. A. (1991). The development of self-
directed learning behavior in a partially teacher-centered problem-
based learning curriculum. Teaching and Learning Medicine, 4, 3–8.

   Bodnar, J. (1974). Creative problem solving model. Unpublished
manuscript. (Available from C. J. Maker, Department of Special
Education, University of Arizona, P.O. Box 210069, Tucson, AZ
85721-0069).

   Borkowski, J. F. (1985). Signsofintelligence: Strategygeneralization
and metacognition. In R. S. Yussen (Ed.), The growth of reflective
thought on children (pp. 105–144). New York: Academic Press.
   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515